Showing posts with label writers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label writers. Show all posts
Saturday, February 6, 2016
H is for Hawk or leaving the wild
H is for Hawk. By Helen Macdonald.
This book has been winning awards and is wildly popular. As often is the case,
I’m late to the party. But now I’m glad to have read it.
When Macdonald’s father died no one
anticipated it, least of all Helen. In her grief she went a little crazy. As a
child she was fascinated by birds of all kinds, but especially the predator
birds – hawks, merlins, falcons, kites, kestrels. As an adult she learned how
to train and fly some of the smaller species, but never the goshawk which is
considered one of the most aggressive and difficult to train. Hawks, especially
goshawks, are not pets in the way of dogs or cats, they remain ultimately wild
and untamable. Intent on murder and blood, with their enormous talons and sharp
beaks, they are perfectly, awesomely equipped to kill rabbits and pheasants. So
in ways it felt natural to turn to the challenge of training Mabel, a young
goshawk, in the hope that it would take her on a distracting journey out of
grief. As the weeks passed she sank further into depression, withdrawing from
friends and family, and identifying more and more with her goshawk. Until…
It seems to me that the entire book could be summarized in
this one paragraph. Don’t worry it’s not a spoiler – there is much more to the
book that is fascinating: falconry – what is required to train a hawk to fly free
and then return to the gloved fist and Macdonald’s reflections on the layers of
grief and the ways it manifests itself. As a research scholar at Cambridge, she
was well equipped to write this book and also had the creative skill that makes
it a good read.
So here was the pivot – the wisdom garnered:
“All the way home on the train I thought of Dad and the
terrible mistake I had made. I’d thought that to heal my great hurt, I should
flee to the wild. It was what people did. The nature books I’d read told me so.
So many of them had been quests inspired by grief or sadness. Some had fixed
themselves to the stars of elusive animals. Some sought snow geese. Others snow
leopards. Others cleaved to the earth, walked trails, mountains, coasts and
glens. Some sought wildness at a distance, others close to home. ‘Nature in her
green tranquil woods heals and soothes all afflictions,’ wrote John Muir ‘Earth
hath no sorrows that earth cannot heal.’
Now I knew
this for what it was: a beguiling but dangerous lie. I was furious with myself
and my own unconscious certainty that this was the cure I needed. Hands are for
other human hands to hold. They should not be reserved exclusively as perches
for hawks. And the wild is not a panacea for the human soul; too much in the
air can corrode it to nothing.”
In a time when many believe that nature heals all
afflictions, I admire Macdonald for bravely stating it does not, although I
doubt she would call it brave. Because my roots grew out of a remote and rural
place in northern Minnesota, I admit I’ve often been beguiled by the beauty of wild
creation that can give a restorative perspective not found in an urban setting.
At times in life I’ve been certain that leaving for the wild, perhaps forever,
is what I need for calm and focus, but she’s right, the earth simply cannot
heal everything. It cannot replace the community we were made to live in as
human beings. We need relationships. It cannot heal all our sorrows – only God
is able to do that even though we know not everything will necessarily be put
to right until Jesus returns. So we wait for it in the now, but the not yet
time. Meantime, I’m not quitting my jaunts to lonely places because they often serve
to rephrase life, but it is good to remind your soul that those beautiful
lonely places won’t deliver everything you need.
Labels:
Animals,
pain,
Toad Hall kitchen Tension of living,
writers,
writing
Wednesday, September 10, 2014
Naming a book
I have a pretty hard time with titles. I know not everyone
cares about this. So it won’t offend me if you go away. But I suspect everyone faces a time
when they need to name something or
other whether it is a pet or a weekend seminar. Getting something that people
identify with, that draws them in, doesn’t embarrass you and is still artistic?
Good luck, Margie.
My work today is deciding a title for a new book, a
collection of Notes From Toad Hall a publication I’ve been writing for almost forever. A few
days ago, I began with some suggestions from my editor and a working title Real Life at Toad Hall. But decided the
book doesn’t represent “Real” life at Toad Hall. It’s only a few snapshots of
life picked out of a myriad.
Next I tried Stumbling
Toward Grace: A Collection of Notes From Toad Hall. A friend asked, really?
Do we stumble toward grace or is it
that God pursues us with grace. Well,
yes. That’s true. Plus it seemed long and cumbersome.
Trying to generalize a collection could even bore the
author’s mother. As in Notes From Toad Hall: A Collection. Another
problem that friend pointed out is that with a collection if you try too hard to
enfold or capture all the content into one title it becomes artificial and you
end up with something formal and stiff. Or boring. Brilliant. I’d never thought of it that
way.
So how do you capture a theme with so many different
storylines and events? Basically you don’t. Better to concentrate on something
more specific. We know most people respond in concrete ways to concrete images.
So as we looked through the chapters we hoped that something would emerge,
something that would evoke, not only an interesting image, but could, in a multi-layered
way, represent more than just that chapter.
The introduction then popped because of an image used there.
But the next temptation was getting too clever. Clever in your own mind anyway.
I came up with Bobblehead Jesus is
Watching You: A Collection of Notes From Toad Hall. First of all it seemed
way too long, then it seemed too quirky, like I was trying too hard to be
funny. It is also one-layered and obscure.
So I went back to an image that stood out from the introduction, thanks to that same genius friend – that of God being in the sink with us. It had
potential. If we think of life as a sink – it really is true that God is in
there with us whether the sink is full of sudsy warm water or a pile of greasy,
dirty dishes. We’ve all lived on both sides of that equation. Sorry, if that
was insultingly obvious.
So this is where we’ve landed God in the Sink: Essays From Toad Hall. In the meantime, while I dwaddled with this
post, the editor decided for sure. This will be the title of my next book
which will be out in November if all goes well. I’m excited about this.
Thanks for stopping by.
Wednesday, August 6, 2014
2014 Blog Tour - Writing in the Cracks
Nancy Nordenson, a writer friend, invited me to join a blog tour - called The Magical Mystery Tour - about the process of writing, not the Beatles. Not sure the exact meaning, except that writing often feels like someone needs to sprinkle magic on my words or they won't be readable.
I often write in the cracks of life - about something as ordinary as weeds, the weeds you try to pull from the sidewalk in your front yard. This is how I answered the questions:
Jenni Simmons, who wears many hats as an editor and writer, is up next. She is editor of Arthouse America Blog, and just recently became general editor for Kalos Press. Jenni is also a seasoned tweeter and instagramer with an eye for beauty found in everyday places.
Nancy is a respected Medical Writer and essayist, the author of JustThink, Nourish Your Mind to Feed Your Soul, and of the forthcoming Finding Livelihood: A Progress of Work andLeisure. Her blog is called Just Thinking where she does her creative writing. To read her answers click on her blog.
I am honored to be asked by Nancy and in a sort of pass-it-on style I'm to tag two more writers who can join the tour and spread the magic. However, I've been so out of touch with other bloggers, they've finally all left me. However, I do know one person who will do a terrific job on this tour and has graciously agreed to join. (Please see more on Jenni below.)
![]() | |
| New office in "The House Between." No excuses now. |
1-What am I working on?
2-How does my work differ from others in its genre?
3-Why do I write what I do?
4-How does my writing process work?
1. What am I working on?
Perhaps answering these questions will inspire me to finish
working toward my current deadline.
Right now, this very minute I should be rewriting an essay
to be included in a collection coming out later this year called Real Life at Toad Hall. Yesterday, I
thought we would need to leave this one out because I began at point A and
switched directions so many times without logic or warning it would confuse a
gyroscope. I wondered how I could have published it in the first place. It made
me feel desperate. I don’t think of killing myself, but I would like to kill
something, maybe an earwig. I am three days past my editor’s deadline and it
looks like it will take longer, with at least
three more to wrangle. A break to join
this blog tour may be just the thing that helps.
2. How does my work differ from others in its genre?
I write memoir and personal essay with an emphasis on
narrative. But I have trouble clarifying how it differs from other like
writing. Perhaps it’s a self-image issue. My step-dad used to say, “Girl,
you’re not half so smart as you think you are.” In a way, I grew up believing
some of that and fighting with it. Foundational to all my writing is the issue
of faith and spirituality – how it shapes and informs all parts of life. When
my memoir The Exact Place was
published, I learned there are many who dislike memoir with good reason. They
find many of them self-absorbed or insufferably bitter. Somehow, I avoided that
while writing about difficult things at the same time. In both memoir and in my
personal essays, which for many years have appeared as “Notes From Toad Hall,”
I strive for honesty. I especially think that many of us who claim Christianity
struggle with letting others see us – flawed and intemperate as we are. So it
is important to me that we challenge that image and yet find hope that helps us
continue our journey. I don’t think this desire is unique to me. Each writer
has a distinct voice that is important to find. Mine doesn’t sound that memorable
to me, but at least I recognize it, and will keep practicing the scales and singing
the songs, trying to get it right. That’s not a bad thing.
3. Why do I write what I do?
I think it is very connected to what I mentioned already
about being honest. Honesty is stronger when it is united with a desire to love
others, not just bash them with the truth. Honesty is not just telling every
detail about the troubles you have, either. But I guess we know that, don’t we?
So, what motivates me is… well, let me go back for an example. When I was newly
married, we attended a church and saw mature couples all nicely dressed sitting
beside one another in the pew, the husband’s arm around his wife. No one ever,
EVER breathed a word about the troubles a couple might face in getting along
with one another. I know that was way back in the day and some things are a lot
more healthy and open now. I knew the inside of some of these homes, they were
not as pretty as they presented. When my young husband and I faced bumps, there
was nowhere to go for mentors or models. Sometimes in desperation I yelled at
my husband; “I wish I were a guy and I would so beat you up.” Yes, yes, I know.
Abuse. I want to write to give people hope that we are not alone, that there
are potentially other ways of looking at things. I want people to know there
may not be answers, but there is Someone who is not surprised by any of our
scheisse and loves us still.
![]() |
| Weeds in the cracks |
4. How does my writing process work?
I am pathetic. Writing is the hardest work I do. I often
avoid it at all costs, I will be out pulling weeds from the cracks in the
sidewalk when I should be writing. I write at the computer, but revise and edit
on paper. The internet has infinite ways of destroying my concentration. I shut
off email when the burden to write grows heavier than I can bear. It can’t be
dinging at me when I’m trying to compose. I stare out the window. Wipe the
crumbs off my keyboard. Chew the eraser heads off pencils. Because I live with
some physical issues, I need to set the timer to make myself get up and walk
around every so often or my muscles freeze. When I face a blockage, I know that
to get past it I HAVE to live with it. So I sit and fidget with the piece and
tell myself I am not allowed out of my chair for one whole hour. I may do
nothing more than shift a comma, but I don’t let myself leave until the time is
up. Then I reward myself with a piece of chocolate and a cup of coffee. It is a
mystery to me how this can work, but it actually, usually, often, gets me past
the wall.
Jenni Simmons, who wears many hats as an editor and writer, is up next. She is editor of Arthouse America Blog, and just recently became general editor for Kalos Press. Jenni is also a seasoned tweeter and instagramer with an eye for beauty found in everyday places.
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
The givenness of everything
Denis and I think, speak, try to live with the understanding that all we do is whole. We are not Christians here and over there we are an athlete, here we practice our faith, here, for the moment, I am buying spices or reconciling my bank account. Same with writing.
Posted on the Kalos Press blog:
Richard Doster helps me think about what this means for my own writing and faith as he points to so many writers of great literature whose faith was integral to their life and living:
“In speaking about life and faith,
Marilyn Robinson declares, ‘I’ve never found them to be incompatible …. Frankly,
historically speaking, a great deal of English language literature is generated
directly out of religious thought and religious erudition.’ Then, with words
that bring O’Connor and Percy to mind, she said, ‘For me, a religious mindset
creates a habit of scrupulous inquiry relative to virtually everything ….’ She
explained to Lanpher [Katherine Lanpher was interviewing] that, ‘… everything
has religious significance. It’s not as if I go from one area of interest to
another,’ she said, ‘they’re simultaneous for me.'
“From Robinson, throughout the whole of the conversation, there’s not a syllable of defensiveness; there’s no awkwardness, no need to shy away from anything she believes. And from Lanpher, there’s only respect for a great writer.
“The conversation later veers down this charming path, as the Pulitzer Prize winning Christian so casually explains to the secular interviewer on a nationally distributed podcast that John Calvin is 'cool in a lot of ways. If you read his sermons on the 10 Commandments,’ Robinson explains, ‘they’re absolutely beautiful, profoundly humane interpretations of things that many people find forbidding.’ She continues, talking about how Calvin situated sacred and human experience in the mind and in perception, and about how she feels indebted to the 16th century reformer for his understanding of, 'the givenness of everything.' ”
Kalos Press reprinted this article with permission from
byFaith magazine.
Labels:
Faithfulness,
Ordinary,
spiritual disciplines,
writers,
writing
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Closer to creation
The power of observation to capture an almost nothing: A seventy-six word sentence neatly followed by one much shorter. Almost perfect.
In the palm of her hand was what looked at first like a shred of whitish dust but on closer inspection turned out to be a little downy feather, no more than an inch long, with a needle-thin white spine out of which grew first a nimbus of fluff and then, for about a third of an inch, neatly tapering white filaments clinging to one another with their minute jellyfish barbules to form a triangular tip. Certainly it looked closely related to dust, and by that branch of the family a cousin of absolute nothingness.
From It’s Beginning to Hurt by James Lasdun
In the palm of her hand was what looked at first like a shred of whitish dust but on closer inspection turned out to be a little downy feather, no more than an inch long, with a needle-thin white spine out of which grew first a nimbus of fluff and then, for about a third of an inch, neatly tapering white filaments clinging to one another with their minute jellyfish barbules to form a triangular tip. Certainly it looked closely related to dust, and by that branch of the family a cousin of absolute nothingness.
From It’s Beginning to Hurt by James Lasdun
Sunday, April 20, 2008
Writers Talk
Some quotes from the Festival of Faith & Writing. I wrote them down as spoken. I hope I got them right, but can’t vouch for every comma.
….most machines were put on earth to hurt me.
- Mary Gordon. From her lecture: “Is Fiction Moral?”
I was raised a pagan, a savage, and I still need to be careful not to convince myself that Jack Daniels and crack are not sacramental.
- Mary Karr. From her lecture: “Writing & Praying Your Way to Truth.
Last night I [Alan Jacobs] met Mary Karr who asked me, ‘What made you write a book about sin?’
I said, ‘Didn’t they teach you to write what you know?’
‘Oh,’ she replied, ‘I thought they said, you reap what you sow.’
After a lecture a young man approached me and said, ‘Mr. Jacobs, I love your work, it has changed my life. I don’t think I have the talent to be a fiction writer or a poet, but I think I could be an essayist.’
- Alan Jacobs in his discussion on personal essay.
As a historian, I ask: which would be more interesting? A memoir by Louis IV or a memoir by the servant who emptied his chamber pot? The farther down the social scale, the more interesting.
- Carlos Eire. From his lecture: “Where Falsehoods Dissolve: Memory as Witness.”
If you lie in a novel – you’re a terrible writer.
If you lie in a memoir – you’re a terrible person.
- Haven Kimmel. From her conversation: “Writing a Life.”
I followed the mosquito.
- David Athey from Moose Lake, MN, on the 18 years it took to bring Danny Gospel to press.
Eternity is written in the hearts of saints and fools. It’s in their movies, too.
Sometimes we learn of glory through its absence.
- Jeffery Overstreet. From his lecture “Through a Screen Darkly.”
The artist who can’t play, can’t create. Go home dancing – to create beauty in your life and in the lives of others.
- Katherine Paterson. From her lecture “Stories of Beauty.”
….most machines were put on earth to hurt me.
- Mary Gordon. From her lecture: “Is Fiction Moral?”
I was raised a pagan, a savage, and I still need to be careful not to convince myself that Jack Daniels and crack are not sacramental.
- Mary Karr. From her lecture: “Writing & Praying Your Way to Truth.
Last night I [Alan Jacobs] met Mary Karr who asked me, ‘What made you write a book about sin?’
I said, ‘Didn’t they teach you to write what you know?’
‘Oh,’ she replied, ‘I thought they said, you reap what you sow.’
After a lecture a young man approached me and said, ‘Mr. Jacobs, I love your work, it has changed my life. I don’t think I have the talent to be a fiction writer or a poet, but I think I could be an essayist.’
- Alan Jacobs in his discussion on personal essay.
As a historian, I ask: which would be more interesting? A memoir by Louis IV or a memoir by the servant who emptied his chamber pot? The farther down the social scale, the more interesting.
- Carlos Eire. From his lecture: “Where Falsehoods Dissolve: Memory as Witness.”
If you lie in a novel – you’re a terrible writer.
If you lie in a memoir – you’re a terrible person.
- Haven Kimmel. From her conversation: “Writing a Life.”
I followed the mosquito.
- David Athey from Moose Lake, MN, on the 18 years it took to bring Danny Gospel to press.
Eternity is written in the hearts of saints and fools. It’s in their movies, too.
Sometimes we learn of glory through its absence.
- Jeffery Overstreet. From his lecture “Through a Screen Darkly.”
The artist who can’t play, can’t create. Go home dancing – to create beauty in your life and in the lives of others.
- Katherine Paterson. From her lecture “Stories of Beauty.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



