Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts
Saturday, February 6, 2016
H is for Hawk or leaving the wild
H is for Hawk. By Helen Macdonald.
This book has been winning awards and is wildly popular. As often is the case,
I’m late to the party. But now I’m glad to have read it.
When Macdonald’s father died no one
anticipated it, least of all Helen. In her grief she went a little crazy. As a
child she was fascinated by birds of all kinds, but especially the predator
birds – hawks, merlins, falcons, kites, kestrels. As an adult she learned how
to train and fly some of the smaller species, but never the goshawk which is
considered one of the most aggressive and difficult to train. Hawks, especially
goshawks, are not pets in the way of dogs or cats, they remain ultimately wild
and untamable. Intent on murder and blood, with their enormous talons and sharp
beaks, they are perfectly, awesomely equipped to kill rabbits and pheasants. So
in ways it felt natural to turn to the challenge of training Mabel, a young
goshawk, in the hope that it would take her on a distracting journey out of
grief. As the weeks passed she sank further into depression, withdrawing from
friends and family, and identifying more and more with her goshawk. Until…
It seems to me that the entire book could be summarized in
this one paragraph. Don’t worry it’s not a spoiler – there is much more to the
book that is fascinating: falconry – what is required to train a hawk to fly free
and then return to the gloved fist and Macdonald’s reflections on the layers of
grief and the ways it manifests itself. As a research scholar at Cambridge, she
was well equipped to write this book and also had the creative skill that makes
it a good read.
So here was the pivot – the wisdom garnered:
“All the way home on the train I thought of Dad and the
terrible mistake I had made. I’d thought that to heal my great hurt, I should
flee to the wild. It was what people did. The nature books I’d read told me so.
So many of them had been quests inspired by grief or sadness. Some had fixed
themselves to the stars of elusive animals. Some sought snow geese. Others snow
leopards. Others cleaved to the earth, walked trails, mountains, coasts and
glens. Some sought wildness at a distance, others close to home. ‘Nature in her
green tranquil woods heals and soothes all afflictions,’ wrote John Muir ‘Earth
hath no sorrows that earth cannot heal.’
Now I knew
this for what it was: a beguiling but dangerous lie. I was furious with myself
and my own unconscious certainty that this was the cure I needed. Hands are for
other human hands to hold. They should not be reserved exclusively as perches
for hawks. And the wild is not a panacea for the human soul; too much in the
air can corrode it to nothing.”
In a time when many believe that nature heals all
afflictions, I admire Macdonald for bravely stating it does not, although I
doubt she would call it brave. Because my roots grew out of a remote and rural
place in northern Minnesota, I admit I’ve often been beguiled by the beauty of wild
creation that can give a restorative perspective not found in an urban setting.
At times in life I’ve been certain that leaving for the wild, perhaps forever,
is what I need for calm and focus, but she’s right, the earth simply cannot
heal everything. It cannot replace the community we were made to live in as
human beings. We need relationships. It cannot heal all our sorrows – only God
is able to do that even though we know not everything will necessarily be put
to right until Jesus returns. So we wait for it in the now, but the not yet
time. Meantime, I’m not quitting my jaunts to lonely places because they often serve
to rephrase life, but it is good to remind your soul that those beautiful
lonely places won’t deliver everything you need.
Labels:
Animals,
pain,
Toad Hall kitchen Tension of living,
writers,
writing
Wednesday, November 18, 2015
Where the wild ducks are
For a few days of solitude, I’ve come away to a quiet place.
Perhaps I will find headspace to write again.
I’ve watched the wild ducks gather at the bottom of the lawn.
In a puddle spread before the shore a family of mallards nibble and nibble on
something under the water. Roots? Chickweed? They ruffle their tails and preen
their breasts, comfortably relaxing into the soggy grass as if into a hot spa.
A female scolds a male and he sprints from her clacking beak. After the ducks
depart a pair of crows splash into the puddle and then sip their bathwater. A
black squirrel runs up and down the oak with mouthfuls of leaves. I see she is
building a winter nest as she shapes them into a ragged clump. There is healing
in these observations. I waken to more than despair and “forethought of grief.”
I do. I am almost happy.
The Peace of Wild Things
When despair for the world grows in me
and I wake in the night at the least
sound
in fear of what my life and my
children’s lives may be,
I go and lie down where the wood drake
rests in his beauty on the water, and
the great heron feeds.
I come into the peace of wild things
who do not tax their lives with
forethought
of grief. I come into the presence of
still water.
And I feel above me the day-blind stars
waiting with their light. For a time
I rest in the grace of the world, and am
free. – Wendell Berry
![]() |
| Mallard Family eating in the rain. |
Thursday, February 5, 2015
Making a room for love and writing
It always encourages
me when I come across a writer who writes more slowly than me. One year at the Festival for Faith and Writing at Calvin
College, I went to a workshop given by a man who had taken twenty years to publish
his book. I left snapping my fingers saying, yessss. For my first book, The Exact Place, took seven years from
start to finish.
![]() |
| Jake & Joie Meador |
So what to do when you come across someone who writes so
fast his pencils smoke?
Well, I think many factors are woven together in a person
that makes his or her writing style unique. Personal habits, stage of life, natural
talent. And it helps to be someone who doesn’t wait for ideal conditions in
which to write. (I am expert on that
topic. I often avoid putting words to paper because I am waiting for my body,
the pantry, the weather, the stars to align before I get down to business.) So
I applaud this young friend, Jake Meador – as he pours himself wholeheartedly into the
art of writing. He has a fascinating array of interests and is able to write
well about each of them. From theology to soccer columns, journalism reports to blog posts about the demands of love in Harry Potter, they all pour out of his head. I once asked him how
he managed to write so prolifically and yet do it well. He answered like this –
and I have permission to share:
“My wife and I joke that I have undiagnosed Asperger’s,
which is actually a real possibility, and so being in a place with noise is
actually awful for my working. I need silence b/c I want to focus super intensely
on whatever I'm doing, but I hear everything at the same time at close to the
same volume, so being able to focus is hard for me if I'm in a place with a lot
of noise. So I either work in a home office or in the stacks at the local
university's research library. The upside to the Asperger’s is that I'm able to
do a ton of writing in a fairly short amount of time at a level I'm happy with,
which is probably the only reason I can write for four soccer sites while also
doing work for Mere Orthodoxy, Fare Forward, and whatever freelance
stuff I pick up.”
Yesterday Jake posted a piece about the work of Wendell
Berry on Fare Forward. It is so insightful
that Jake had me wanting to go back to read all of Berry’s work in order to
explore this particular theme. His piece is a summary, in a way, of Berry’s
understanding of what it means “to daily break the body and shed the blood of
Creation.” Clearly, the burden of learning to live in creation lovingly and
knowingly is suffused throughout Berry’s essays and works of fiction. Jake’s summary
is done with such tender insight I had to share it with you. Go to the site,
read the post. You’ll be blessed.
“In Berry’s work, marriage isn’t simply a social contract or
an emotional bond; it’s a way of orienting oneself to the rhythms of creation.
It’s the process of undergoing an organic “breaking,” much as one would break
the earth when plowing, in order to produce a harvest. Seeds are planted and in
time we reap a harvest—Paul might say a resurrection. For Berry the language of
marriage is never far from the language of health, flourishing, and beauty.” - Wendell Berry’s Room of Love by Jake Meador.
Labels:
Creation care,
marriage,
Wendell Berry,
writing
Wednesday, January 7, 2015
"Bless Your Heart"?
What is it called when the words you
say have a meaning completely opposite from their actual definition?
Here's a for instance that is pretty innocuous. Or is it? I'm not sure.
In conversation if you tell someone something and they
respond in a hearty voice with, “Good!” or "Great!" You kinda get
they don't mean good or great at all. What they probably mean is, I don't have
time to listen to your pathetic stories. Or, you are boring me so bad, I’d like
to slap you, but I love Jesus. Or, leftovers again? Or….?
The satirist at The Cresset, (a literary and art journal
published by Valparaiso University) – Tom Willadsen, wrote a little rant about
what "Bless your heart," really means, and it got me thinking about
my own use of handy verbal punctuation and a little habit I have of taking
others to task for their use of it.
I've had some conversations about that very phrase and my
friends agreed that, for example, if someone says, "Bless her heart, she's
trying to lose weight" what that really means is: “I’m sure glad I’m a
size 4!” Or, “too bad she can’t stay on
that diet, because she’s a big momma.” Or, “I lay money on it. She’s a
closet eater.” I had already decided not to use that comment again. But there
are others I need to excise. Just saying I’m not exactly snow-white here.
Willadsen wrote:
“I now use the phrase as a verbal crossed fingers behind my
back. I say “Bless your heart,: but I
mean:
·
Each day in my prayers I lament that you had
children, or
·
As far as I can tell, your sole purpose on the
planet is to irritate everyone you encounter, or
·
Given a choice between having white-hot tungsten
spikes thrust through my lungs, and accepting your invitation, I’m going with
the spikes, or
·
Remember that device I told you about that
measures my hostility? Your request has rendered it obsolete, or
·
I hate you.”
My thinking this is funny might reveal something twisted in
me. I can yammer on about how we ought to be living and growing in the fruit of
the spirit – in fact, only the other day I pressed hard on someone who was
verbally unkind to another. This could be dangerous, like I’m the
self-righteous, brickhead Publican dumping on the Sinner over in the
corner.
On the other hand, if satire is, as the dictionary defines
it, “the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize
people's stupidity or vices;” and if satire is what Willadsen is doing, then,
he succeeded and maybe we can laugh because we see ourselves and humor helps it
go down a little more easily.
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
Curating with gasps
I recently discovered the artist and writer Maira Kalman and
am utterly charmed. In the first glances at her work I wondered if I was
looking at a child’s art project because her drawings are folky and simple. But
what quickly emerges is cunning truth about the subject and a subtle humor that
reveals a mature hand behind the work. Her gift is to give you pause. To
reconsider what you nearly passed by, what you so quickly consigned to the trite
and ordinary, to pause for a minute and find unexpected meaning and/or beauty.
BrainPickings
describes her work as having: “a spartan sincerity … an elegantly choreographed
spontaneity – words meticulously chosen to be as simple as possible, yet
impossibly expressive; drawings that invoke childhood yet brim with the complex
awarenesses of a life lived long and wide.”
She has published a number of books but the one I discovered
first was My Favorite Things. I had
to get past the title – at first, all I
could hear was Julie Andrews droning on … “these are a few of my favorite
things… da-da, da, dah..” But the book quickly invites you to look at her list
and think in new categories. At the same time she asks the reader a serious question:
“How do you curate a life?” I ask, how do you curate your life? Or mine?
“…We begin with a portrait…” she writes.
In her hand-written, plain prose she tells us she has been
chosen to curate an exhibition for a small museum in New York City, the
Cooper-Hewitt National Design Museum, and what a dilemma it is to choose from
among centuries-worth of objects! Post cards from the Hotel Celeste in Tunisia.
Hats. A fragile vase carefully painted in red and green and signed – someone
loved it enough to keep it over a lifetime then pass it on.
This is why her work captured me: It struck me that her filter
is one through which we could all strain our own collections. She writes: “The
pieces I chose were based on ONE thing only – a gasp of DELIGHT.” Then she
asks, “Isn’t that the only way to CURATE a LIFE? To live among things that make
you GASP with delight?” (p. 9)
Of COURSE, not everything is going to make you gasp. What
inspires me may quietly turn you off.
(If you are kind you won’t mention it. And I promise your inspirations
won’t make me sign you up for an exorcism.) I began to realize that is why some
of the very things others pass over will make another “gasp with delight.” It
can be quite an individual matter. For example, I could see by the cover
illustration on her book that Kalman enjoys photos of dandies from the 1930s.
The way they dressed and paraded across the sand in their garish red and white
stripped suits on the beach at Coney Island looking all satisfied with
themselves. They make me smile.
I understand that not EVERYthing needs to make me gasp. I
don’t want to have an asthma attack when I climb into bed at night. I mean.
There needs to be calm scenes. Functionality. Quiet colors. Soft beds. Crisp
sheets. Most of my bedroom is not required to make me gasp. We understand. But
there are things I might now keep and others I may shed because she has named
this way of curating.
I am intrigued by possibilities. By a new way of thinking
about what everyday things can delight. What causes us to gasp? In this world
with so much that is broken, broken, broken, I wonder if we could keep some of
those good things, and also share a little. Like the annoying “Little Drummer
Boy,” (oops. I guess he’s not on my gasping list.) perhaps I can give you what
I have, which isn’t much, I admit. I can give what I write this year. I can
keep on trying to stay focused long enough to make something of it. If my
writing can cause you to, well, if not GASP with delight, but perhaps give a
slight twitch in your nucleus accumbens (look it up.) that would make me very
happy.
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
Work, writing, and dodging rotten fish
Tell me what made you think I’d want to read about what you
did yesterday? Your books didn’t arrive on the UPS truck when they were
supposed to and now all your orders are late? You need new socks because all
your old ones have holes? Waaa. Hearing about whatever it is you are up to is a
waste of my time. Throw rotten fish.
There is a person in my life who sits on my shoulder, watching,
someone who lifts an eyebrow and a corner of the lip while reading my
sentences. I sense a cynical vibe asking, why aren’t you doing something more
meaningful? Feeding the hungry? Something valuable. Perhaps you should clean
your closet or something. But stop this bushwa.
We (Denis & I) often talk about how every square inch of
life and reality belongs to the Lord Christ. That includes calling and vocation.
Part of my calling right now is writing. Working on another manuscript. Posting
to my blog. Writing my quarterly publication “Letters from the House Between.” Answering
mail. Even after all these years of understanding the importance of being
faithful in what you’ve been called to do today
and not imagining some big sensational save or Pulitzer Prize for your
astonishing work, I can have doubts about what I do.
This isn’t strictly a “Christian” problem; people who don’t
necessarily practice a faith also suffer from the guilt of living in a world
with so much misery and sorrow and trying to reckon the worth of what they do. Recently
I watched a 60 Minutes program about
Syrian refugees that was so heartbreaking I sat on the couch and bawled. How
could I be living in safety with a bowl of popcorn and a can of Coke while
thousands were escaping up a hill into a Jordanian refugee camp - their wounded bodies and hearts
repositories of violence – their faces pinched with starvation and fear – How
could I go about being a barista or a software developer or a writer? Especially a writer? (Opportunities to
help do abound. And we can find them. That is a good topic for another time.) But,
I’ve needed to reaffirm that it isn’t just okay, it is good to write.
Molly Wizenberg concludes her book Delancy: A Man, A Woman, ARestaurant, A Marriage by trying to work out their dilemma regarding the
significance of opening a restaurant and her choice to write.
“…when I decided to quit graduate school, I was newly broken
up with a boyfriend. He was a very kind, serious, thoughtful guy, someone who
tutors kids with severe learning disabilities in his free time. I remember
feeling so frivolous in comparison, so guilty, as I thought about giving up
academia to try being a food writer. Food writing wasn’t important. It wouldn’t
save a life. I did it anyway, because I wanted to, but I certainly couldn’t
justify it on the grounds of world peace. That justification doesn’t work for
opening a restaurant either. But there is something about Delancey that, to me,
matters just as much: We get to make people happy. We get to give people a good
night. We get to spend our days doing work that we can be proud of, and when
we’re done, there’s all the pizza you can eat.”
P 225.
What I do everyday does matter. It may not be worthy of a Ten Best Books list, but I know this is
what God has for me to do right now. If I listened too much to my doubts or to
that person who sits on my shoulder sifting my words, paralysis would set in. Wizenberg
may not be able to say “God has made me for this purpose” and understand that
because they are making the best pizzas they can and she is being a good food
writer honors God, but I can say it. He has created humans to live and work
before him and it pleases him to bless us however big or small, significant or
insignificant our work.
Tuesday, November 4, 2014
Fort Lauderdale here and there
Taking a short break from my ordinary. Yesterday, I finished
writing the next issue of Letters from the House Between. (Although it will be another three weeks before it gets
mailed out.) Wrapping always gives equal waves of relief, regrets for what I
wrote – never good enough – and the urge
to leave. Perhaps it’s a common feeling when something is completed, something
you pour yourself into, that you have a sense of
emptiness? To persuade myself not to pay much attention to that, I go to a
coffee shop. Lingering, then moving on to the next thing. Today it was
Patisserie 46. Denis dropped Anita and I off while he went on to Bethel
University to visit their library and book store, doing some research for a
project. I see why 46 gets raves – I had an almond croissant – never one this
flaky, melty-good – and a creamy almond latte. Feeling better.
![]() |
| Almond latte at Patisserie 46 |
We leave for Fort Lauderdale next week. Not vacation, but
work. We welcome this trip, though. It’s a chance to connect with people who
love the arts, are interested in creativity and how popular culture reflects
human longing for meaning. So if you are a friend who lives in the area, or
would like to BE our friend, join us in
discussion. I will be reflecting on the ordinary: how it carries traces of the
sacred (are you shocked? No?) and reading from God in the Sink. Denis will be giving lectures on film and how they
can give windows of insight into our culture. (His lectures are always prime.
Truly, I am his severest critic, trust me):
Here is where we’ll be:
Monday, November 10, St. Mark’s Episcopal, Fort Lauderdale. Evening
session.
Tuesday Noon, November 11, I will be at Kenny Lunsford’s Book Club in Boca
Raton.
Tuesday Evening, November 11, we will be at Coral Ridge Church, Fort Lauderdale sharing an evening session.
Wednesday Morning, November 12, Dianne Garvin’s Book Club.
Wednesday Evening, November 12, New Covenant Church, Pompano
Beach, for their evening supper and service.
Please forgive my bumbling efforts to get a workable button
on the sidebar. It looks anything but professional. I can’t get the entire book
cover to show, just “the sink” part. You can still help launch this little book
into the world if you pre-order God in
the Sink now. It’s on sale for $9:95 until its release in mid-November. At
that rate, everyone you know could receive a copy for Christmas. Or for any reason, any time.
Wednesday, September 17, 2014
Serious Gray
My office is gradually becoming this color ... Serious Gray by Sherwin Williams. I think it should be called something else. Perhaps just for today. Quietly Happy. Or Unexpected Grey.
My day began with a random surprise. After I dropped my sister-in-law off at the airport it was 5:50 A.M. and I pulled through Starbucks drive-up for a latte. When I reached the window the barista told me the person ahead of me had paid for my coffee and said I should have a good day. A random act of kindness. All day long I've tasted that sweet moment - it has made me feel like I sit under a rainbow or something.
Today I'm doing a final proof of the manuscript God in the Sink. I could spend hours hunched over the pages and the computer. So to keep myself from getting permanently crooked I decided to set the timer. 45 minutes at the computer and 45 minutes painting my office. I'm almost done with the manuscript, about 1/4 of the office is painted and there are still some hours left in the day. It's been a good plan for this day.
So far the funniest mistake I found was a sentence that mentioned how Minnesotans often end sentences with a preposition, like "Do you wanna go with?" Instead of preposition I had written proposition. Can't remember the last time I was propositioned. Oh, well.
During the last painting slot I listened to an interview with John Stott. I think the best quote out of it was:
"I've learnt very early on that Christianity is not a religion and it is not an institution, it is a person. It was enormously helpful for me to discover that Christianity is Christ and and that what matters is a personal relationship to Christ..... It's all Christ, Christ, Christ, Christ. Knowing Him, loving Him, serving Him, trusting Him, gaining Him. 'To me to live is Christ', Paul said, and I think, I hope without boasting I can say the same, it is a Person."
I almost chose "Gibralter" a shade of darkened stone. But maybe that would've been appropriate, too. Christ, our Rock.
Thanks for stopping by. I hope some time, some day a stranger gives you a coffee, too.
![]() |
| "Serious Gray" |
![]() |
| Random kindness |
![]() |
| Proofing |
During the last painting slot I listened to an interview with John Stott. I think the best quote out of it was:
"I've learnt very early on that Christianity is not a religion and it is not an institution, it is a person. It was enormously helpful for me to discover that Christianity is Christ and and that what matters is a personal relationship to Christ..... It's all Christ, Christ, Christ, Christ. Knowing Him, loving Him, serving Him, trusting Him, gaining Him. 'To me to live is Christ', Paul said, and I think, I hope without boasting I can say the same, it is a Person."
I almost chose "Gibralter" a shade of darkened stone. But maybe that would've been appropriate, too. Christ, our Rock.
Thanks for stopping by. I hope some time, some day a stranger gives you a coffee, too.
Wednesday, September 10, 2014
Naming a book
I have a pretty hard time with titles. I know not everyone
cares about this. So it won’t offend me if you go away. But I suspect everyone faces a time
when they need to name something or
other whether it is a pet or a weekend seminar. Getting something that people
identify with, that draws them in, doesn’t embarrass you and is still artistic?
Good luck, Margie.
My work today is deciding a title for a new book, a
collection of Notes From Toad Hall a publication I’ve been writing for almost forever. A few
days ago, I began with some suggestions from my editor and a working title Real Life at Toad Hall. But decided the
book doesn’t represent “Real” life at Toad Hall. It’s only a few snapshots of
life picked out of a myriad.
Next I tried Stumbling
Toward Grace: A Collection of Notes From Toad Hall. A friend asked, really?
Do we stumble toward grace or is it
that God pursues us with grace. Well,
yes. That’s true. Plus it seemed long and cumbersome.
Trying to generalize a collection could even bore the
author’s mother. As in Notes From Toad Hall: A Collection. Another
problem that friend pointed out is that with a collection if you try too hard to
enfold or capture all the content into one title it becomes artificial and you
end up with something formal and stiff. Or boring. Brilliant. I’d never thought of it that
way.
So how do you capture a theme with so many different
storylines and events? Basically you don’t. Better to concentrate on something
more specific. We know most people respond in concrete ways to concrete images.
So as we looked through the chapters we hoped that something would emerge,
something that would evoke, not only an interesting image, but could, in a multi-layered
way, represent more than just that chapter.
The introduction then popped because of an image used there.
But the next temptation was getting too clever. Clever in your own mind anyway.
I came up with Bobblehead Jesus is
Watching You: A Collection of Notes From Toad Hall. First of all it seemed
way too long, then it seemed too quirky, like I was trying too hard to be
funny. It is also one-layered and obscure.
So I went back to an image that stood out from the introduction, thanks to that same genius friend – that of God being in the sink with us. It had
potential. If we think of life as a sink – it really is true that God is in
there with us whether the sink is full of sudsy warm water or a pile of greasy,
dirty dishes. We’ve all lived on both sides of that equation. Sorry, if that
was insultingly obvious.
So this is where we’ve landed God in the Sink: Essays From Toad Hall. In the meantime, while I dwaddled with this
post, the editor decided for sure. This will be the title of my next book
which will be out in November if all goes well. I’m excited about this.
Thanks for stopping by.
Wednesday, August 6, 2014
2014 Blog Tour - Writing in the Cracks
Nancy Nordenson, a writer friend, invited me to join a blog tour - called The Magical Mystery Tour - about the process of writing, not the Beatles. Not sure the exact meaning, except that writing often feels like someone needs to sprinkle magic on my words or they won't be readable.
I often write in the cracks of life - about something as ordinary as weeds, the weeds you try to pull from the sidewalk in your front yard. This is how I answered the questions:
Jenni Simmons, who wears many hats as an editor and writer, is up next. She is editor of Arthouse America Blog, and just recently became general editor for Kalos Press. Jenni is also a seasoned tweeter and instagramer with an eye for beauty found in everyday places.
Nancy is a respected Medical Writer and essayist, the author of JustThink, Nourish Your Mind to Feed Your Soul, and of the forthcoming Finding Livelihood: A Progress of Work andLeisure. Her blog is called Just Thinking where she does her creative writing. To read her answers click on her blog.
I am honored to be asked by Nancy and in a sort of pass-it-on style I'm to tag two more writers who can join the tour and spread the magic. However, I've been so out of touch with other bloggers, they've finally all left me. However, I do know one person who will do a terrific job on this tour and has graciously agreed to join. (Please see more on Jenni below.)
![]() | |
| New office in "The House Between." No excuses now. |
1-What am I working on?
2-How does my work differ from others in its genre?
3-Why do I write what I do?
4-How does my writing process work?
1. What am I working on?
Perhaps answering these questions will inspire me to finish
working toward my current deadline.
Right now, this very minute I should be rewriting an essay
to be included in a collection coming out later this year called Real Life at Toad Hall. Yesterday, I
thought we would need to leave this one out because I began at point A and
switched directions so many times without logic or warning it would confuse a
gyroscope. I wondered how I could have published it in the first place. It made
me feel desperate. I don’t think of killing myself, but I would like to kill
something, maybe an earwig. I am three days past my editor’s deadline and it
looks like it will take longer, with at least
three more to wrangle. A break to join
this blog tour may be just the thing that helps.
2. How does my work differ from others in its genre?
I write memoir and personal essay with an emphasis on
narrative. But I have trouble clarifying how it differs from other like
writing. Perhaps it’s a self-image issue. My step-dad used to say, “Girl,
you’re not half so smart as you think you are.” In a way, I grew up believing
some of that and fighting with it. Foundational to all my writing is the issue
of faith and spirituality – how it shapes and informs all parts of life. When
my memoir The Exact Place was
published, I learned there are many who dislike memoir with good reason. They
find many of them self-absorbed or insufferably bitter. Somehow, I avoided that
while writing about difficult things at the same time. In both memoir and in my
personal essays, which for many years have appeared as “Notes From Toad Hall,”
I strive for honesty. I especially think that many of us who claim Christianity
struggle with letting others see us – flawed and intemperate as we are. So it
is important to me that we challenge that image and yet find hope that helps us
continue our journey. I don’t think this desire is unique to me. Each writer
has a distinct voice that is important to find. Mine doesn’t sound that memorable
to me, but at least I recognize it, and will keep practicing the scales and singing
the songs, trying to get it right. That’s not a bad thing.
3. Why do I write what I do?
I think it is very connected to what I mentioned already
about being honest. Honesty is stronger when it is united with a desire to love
others, not just bash them with the truth. Honesty is not just telling every
detail about the troubles you have, either. But I guess we know that, don’t we?
So, what motivates me is… well, let me go back for an example. When I was newly
married, we attended a church and saw mature couples all nicely dressed sitting
beside one another in the pew, the husband’s arm around his wife. No one ever,
EVER breathed a word about the troubles a couple might face in getting along
with one another. I know that was way back in the day and some things are a lot
more healthy and open now. I knew the inside of some of these homes, they were
not as pretty as they presented. When my young husband and I faced bumps, there
was nowhere to go for mentors or models. Sometimes in desperation I yelled at
my husband; “I wish I were a guy and I would so beat you up.” Yes, yes, I know.
Abuse. I want to write to give people hope that we are not alone, that there
are potentially other ways of looking at things. I want people to know there
may not be answers, but there is Someone who is not surprised by any of our
scheisse and loves us still.
![]() |
| Weeds in the cracks |
4. How does my writing process work?
I am pathetic. Writing is the hardest work I do. I often
avoid it at all costs, I will be out pulling weeds from the cracks in the
sidewalk when I should be writing. I write at the computer, but revise and edit
on paper. The internet has infinite ways of destroying my concentration. I shut
off email when the burden to write grows heavier than I can bear. It can’t be
dinging at me when I’m trying to compose. I stare out the window. Wipe the
crumbs off my keyboard. Chew the eraser heads off pencils. Because I live with
some physical issues, I need to set the timer to make myself get up and walk
around every so often or my muscles freeze. When I face a blockage, I know that
to get past it I HAVE to live with it. So I sit and fidget with the piece and
tell myself I am not allowed out of my chair for one whole hour. I may do
nothing more than shift a comma, but I don’t let myself leave until the time is
up. Then I reward myself with a piece of chocolate and a cup of coffee. It is a
mystery to me how this can work, but it actually, usually, often, gets me past
the wall.
Jenni Simmons, who wears many hats as an editor and writer, is up next. She is editor of Arthouse America Blog, and just recently became general editor for Kalos Press. Jenni is also a seasoned tweeter and instagramer with an eye for beauty found in everyday places.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















